Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.11.07.22282049

ABSTRACT

Altered myeloid inflammation and lymphopenia are hallmarks of severe infections, including with SARS-CoV-2. Here, we identified a gene program, defined by correlation with EN-RAGE (S100A12) gene expression, which was up-regulated in airway and blood myeloid cells from COVID-19 patients. The EN-RAGE program was expressed in 7 cohorts and observed in patients with both COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from other causes. This program was associated with greater clinical severity and predicted future mechanical ventilation and death. EN-RAGE+ myeloid cells express features consistent with suppressor cell functionality, with low HLA-DR and high PD-L1 surface expression and higher expression of T cell-suppressive genes. Sustained EN-RAGE signature expression in airway and blood myeloid cells correlated with clinical severity and increasing expression of T cell exhaustion markers, such as PD-1. IL-6 treatment of monocytes in vitro upregulated many of the severity-associated genes in the EN-RAGE gene program, along with potential mediators of T cell suppression, such as IL-10. Blockade of IL-6 signaling by tocilizumab in a placebo-controlled clinical trial led to a rapid normalization of ENRAGE and T cell gene expression. This identifies IL-6 as a key driver of myeloid dysregulation associated with worse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients and provides insights into shared pathophysiological mechanisms in non-COVID-19 ARDS.


Subject(s)
Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Parkinson Disease , Chronobiology Disorders , Death , COVID-19 , Inflammation , Lymphopenia
2.
biorxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.10.27.514096

ABSTRACT

Tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor, is recommended in global treatment guidelines for patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. Using proteomic and transcriptomic analysis, we characterized the immune profile and identified cellular and molecular pathways directly modified by tocilizumab in peripheral blood samples collected from patients enrolled in the COVACTA study, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, to assess the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. We identified factors predicting disease severity and clinical outcomes, including markers of inflammation, lymphopenia, myeloid dysfunction, and organ injury. Proteomic analysis confirmed a pharmacodynamic effect for tocilizumab. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that tocilizumab treatment leads to faster resolution of lymphopenia and myeloid dysfunction associated with severe COVID-19, thus defining an anti-inflammatory mechanism of action for the beneficial effects of tocilizumab in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Sarcoma, Myeloid , Pneumonia , Neurocognitive Disorders , COVID-19 , Inflammation , Lymphopenia
3.
medrxiv; 2020.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2020.12.23.20247379

ABSTRACT

Background Retrospective observational studies suggest that interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), ferritin, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, D-dimer, and platelets are associated with disease progression, treatment outcomes, or both, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We explored these candidate prognostic and predictive biomarkers with efficacy outcomes after treatment with tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody using data from the COVACTA trial for patients hospitalised with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods Candidate biomarkers were measured in 295 patients in the tocilizumab arm and 142 patients in the placebo arm. Efficacy outcomes assessed were clinical status on a seven-category ordinal scale (1, discharge; 7, death), mortality, time to hospital discharge, and mechanical ventilation (if not receiving it at randomisation) through day 28. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers were evaluated continuously with proportional odds, binomial or Fine-Gray models, and additional sensitivity analyses. Findings Modelling in the placebo arm showed all candidate biomarkers except LDH and D-dimer were strongly prognostic for day 28 clinical outcomes of mortality, mechanical ventilation, clinical status, and time to hospital discharge. Modelling in the tocilizumab arm showed a predictive value of ferritin for day 28 clinical outcomes of mortality (predictive interaction p=0.03), mechanical ventilation (predictive interaction p=0.01), and clinical status (predictive interaction p=0.02) compared with placebo. Interpretation Multiple biomarkers prognostic for clinical outcomes were confirmed in COVACTA. Ferritin was identified as a predictive biomarker for the effects of tocilizumab in the COVACTA patient population; high ferritin levels were associated with better clinical outcomes for tocilizumab compared with placebo at day 28.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia
4.
Psychother Psychosom ; 90(2): 127-136, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-913881

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the fight against the COVID-19 epidemic continues, medical workers may have allostatic load. OBJECTIVE: During the reopening of society, medical and nonmedical workers were compared in terms of allostatic load. METHODS: An online study was performed; 3,590 Chinese subjects were analyzed. Socio-demographic variables, allostatic load, stress, abnormal illness behavior, global well-being, mental status, and social support were assessed. RESULTS: There was no difference in allostatic load in medical workers compared to nonmedical workers (15.8 vs. 17.8%; p = 0.22). Multivariate conditional logistic regression revealed that anxiety (OR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.18-1.31; p < 0.01), depression (OR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.17-1.29; p < 0.01), somatization (OR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.14-1.25; p < 0.01), hostility (OR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.18-1.30; p < 0.01), and abnormal illness behavior (OR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.34-1.66; p < 0.01) were positively associated with allostatic load, while objective support (OR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.78-0.89; p < 0.01), subjective support (OR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.80-0.88; p < 0.01), utilization of support (OR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.72-0.88; p < 0.01), social support (OR = 0.90; 95% CI 0.87-0.93; p < 0.01), and global well-being (OR = 0.30; 95% CI 0.22-0.41; p < 0.01) were negatively associated. CONCLUSIONS: In the post-COVID-19 epidemic time, medical and nonmedical workers had similar allostatic load. Psychological distress and abnormal illness behavior were risk factors for it, while social support could relieve it.


Subject(s)
Allostasis/physiology , Anxiety/physiopathology , COVID-19 , Depression/physiopathology , Health Personnel , Illness Behavior/physiology , Personal Satisfaction , Social Support , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology , Adult , China , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupations
5.
researchsquare; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-92239.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: A methodical comparison of confirmed and suspected COVID-19 patients has not been previously reported. Therefore, we thoroughly analyzed the demographic and clinical characteristics between these groups to identify mortality risk factors.Methods: A retrospective cohort of 1,276 hospitalized COVID-19 pneumonia patients at Tongren Hospital (Wuhan, China; January 27 to March 3, 2020) was studied. Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate multiple mortality risk factors. Results: Both cohorts of confirmed (n=797) and suspected (n=479) patients exhibited typical demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics. Treatment methods were consistent and both groups shared similarities in many demographic and clinical characteristics: age (≥65, 45.9% vs 41.8%, P=0.378) and lung disease (12.5% vs 14.6%, P=0.293). However, confirmed patients exhibited more severe disease manifestations than those in suspected patients: a higher incidence of fever (65.4% vs 58.0%, P<0.01), lower lymphocyte count (1.12×109/L vs 1.22×109/L, P=0.022), higher C-reactive protein (CRP) (11.60 mg/L vs 7.61mg/L, P=0.021), and more severe radiographic manifestations (lung infection incidence, 3.8% vs 3.0%, P=0.014; ground-glass opacity lesion incidence, 2.3% vs 2.0%, P=0.033). The dynamic profiles of lymphocytes, monocytes, D-dimer, and CRP, clearly delineated confirmed patients from suspected patients exhibiting critical illness. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that lung disease (adjusted hazard ratio 8.972, 95% CI: 3.782-21.283), cardiovascular disease (3.083, 1.347-7.059), neutrophil count (1.189, 1.081-1.307), age (1.068, 1.027-1.110), and ground-glass opacity lesions (1.039, 95% 1.013-1.065), were the main risk factors for mortality in confirmed patients; lung disease (14.725, 2.187-99.147), age (1.076, 1.004-1.153), and CRP level (1.012, 95% CI 1.004-1.020) were the primary factors in suspected patients.Conclusions: Suspected patients with serious illness should seek medical attention to reduce mortality. Multiple factors must be assessed to determine the mortality risk and the appropriate treatment. 


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases , Cardiovascular Diseases , Fever , Pneumonia , COVID-19 , Corneal Opacity
6.
medrxiv; 2020.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2020.08.27.20183442

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND COVID-19 is associated with immune dysregulation and hyperinflammation. Tocilizumab is an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody. METHODS Patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia receiving standard care were randomized (2:1) to double-blinded intravenous tocilizumab 8 mg/kg or placebo. The primary outcome measure was clinical status on a 7-category ordinal scale at day 28 (1, discharged/ready for discharge; 7, death). RESULTS Overall, 452 patients were randomized; the modified-intention-to-treat population included 294 tocilizumab-treated and 144 placebo-treated patients. Clinical status at day 28 was not statistically significantly improved for tocilizumab versus placebo (P=0.36). Median (95% CI) ordinal scale values at day 28: 1.0 (1.0 to 1.0) for tocilizumab and 2.0 (1.0 to 4.0) for placebo (odds ratio, 1.19 [0.81 to 1.76]). There was no difference in mortality at day 28 between tocilizumab (19.7%) and placebo (19.4%) (difference, 0.3% [95% CI, -7.6 to 8.2]; nominal P=0.94). Median time to hospital discharge was 8 days shorter with tocilizumab than placebo (20.0 and 28.0, respectively; nominal P=0.037; hazard ratio 1.35 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.79]). Median duration of ICU stay was 5.8 days shorter with tocilizumab than placebo (9.8 and 15.5, respectively; nominal P=0.045). In the safety population, serious adverse events occurred in 34.9% of 295 patients in the tocilizumab arm and 38.5% of 143 in the placebo arm. CONCLUSIONS In this randomized placebo-controlled trial in hospitalized COVID-19 pneumonia patients, tocilizumab did not improve clinical status or mortality. Potential benefits in time to hospital discharge and duration of ICU stay are being investigated in ongoing clinical trials.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Chronobiology Disorders , Pneumonia , Death
7.
Psychother Psychosom ; 89(4): 242-250, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-45795

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We explored whether medical health workers had more psychosocial problems than nonmedical health workers during the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: An online survey was run from February 19 to March 6, 2020; a total of 2,182 Chinese subjects participated. Mental health variables were assessed via the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), the Symptom Check List-revised (SCL-90-R), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), which included a 2-item anxiety scale and a 2-item depression scale (PHQ-2). RESULTS: Compared with nonmedical health workers (n = 1,255), medical health workers (n = 927) had a higher prevalence of insomnia (38.4 vs. 30.5%, p < 0.01), anxiety (13.0 vs. 8.5%, p < 0.01), depression (12.2 vs. 9.5%; p< 0.04), somatization (1.6 vs. 0.4%; p < 0.01), and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (5.3 vs. 2.2%; p < 0.01). They also had higher total scores of ISI, GAD-2, PHQ-2, and SCL-90-R obsessive-compulsive symptoms (p ≤ 0.01). Among medical health workers, having organic disease was an independent factor for insomnia, anxiety, depression, somatization, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (p < 0.05 or 0.01). Living in rural areas, being female, and being at risk of contact with COVID-19 patients were the most common risk factors for insomnia, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and depression (p < 0.01 or 0.05). Among nonmedical health workers, having organic disease was a risk factor for insomnia, depression, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (p < 0.01 or 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 outbreak, medical health workers had psychosocial problems and risk factors for developing them. They were in need of attention and recovery programs.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/etiology , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Depression/etiology , Health Personnel/psychology , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/etiology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/epidemiology , Pandemics , Prevalence , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL